Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 1:30:01 GMT -6
The was an incredibly important ranking factor and we wanted to help a customer. We would likely be concerned with the internal validity of GSCs time spent downloading a page metric because regardless of what happens to a real user if Google thinks the page is slow we will lose rankings. We would rely on this metric insofar as we were confident it represented what Google believes about the customers site. On the other hand if we are trying to prevent Google from finding bad links we would be concerned about the external validity of the links to your site section because while Google might already know about some bad links we want to make sure there arent any others that Google could stumble upon.
Thus depending on how well GSCs sample links comprehensively describe the Europe Cell Phone Number List links across the web we might reject that metric and use a combination of other sources like Mozs Link Explorer Majestic and Ahrefs which will give us greater coverage. The point of this exercise is simply to say that we can judge GSCs data from multiple perspectives and it is important to tease these out so we know when it is reasonable to rely upon GSC. GSC Section HTML Improvements Of the many useful features in GSC Google provides a list of some common HTML errors it discovered in the course of crawling your site.
This section located at Search Appearance HTML Improvements lists off several potential errors including Duplicate actionable recommendations. Fortunately this first example gives us an opportunity to outline methods for testing both the internal and external validity of the data. As you can see in the screenshot below GSC has found duplicate meta descriptions because a website has case insensitive URLs and no canonical tag or redirect to fix it. Essentially you can reach the page from either Page.aspx or page.aspx and this is apparent as Googlebot
Thus depending on how well GSCs sample links comprehensively describe the Europe Cell Phone Number List links across the web we might reject that metric and use a combination of other sources like Mozs Link Explorer Majestic and Ahrefs which will give us greater coverage. The point of this exercise is simply to say that we can judge GSCs data from multiple perspectives and it is important to tease these out so we know when it is reasonable to rely upon GSC. GSC Section HTML Improvements Of the many useful features in GSC Google provides a list of some common HTML errors it discovered in the course of crawling your site.
This section located at Search Appearance HTML Improvements lists off several potential errors including Duplicate actionable recommendations. Fortunately this first example gives us an opportunity to outline methods for testing both the internal and external validity of the data. As you can see in the screenshot below GSC has found duplicate meta descriptions because a website has case insensitive URLs and no canonical tag or redirect to fix it. Essentially you can reach the page from either Page.aspx or page.aspx and this is apparent as Googlebot